4.4 Article

Highly Accurate Filters to Flag Frequent Hitters in AlphaScreen Assays by Suggesting their Mechanism

期刊

MOLECULAR INFORMATICS
卷 41, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/minf.202100151

关键词

Alphascreen; Frequent hitters; False Positives; Machine Learning; High Throughput Assays; OCHEM

资金

  1. European Union [676434]
  2. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation [075-15-2021-579]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AlphaScreen is a widely used assay technology in drug discovery, but faces challenges with false positives and frequent hitters. Traditional scaffold-based filters are time-consuming to develop, while machine learning methods provide more accurate and easily updatable filters for identification of frequent hitters.
AlphaScreen is one of the most widely used assay technologies in drug discovery due to its versatility, dynamic range and sensitivity. However, a presence of false positives and frequent hitters contributes to difficulties with an interpretation of measured HTS data. Although filters do exist to identify frequent hitters for AlphaScreen, they are frequently based on privileged scaffolds. The development of such filters is time consuming and requires deep domain knowledge. Recently, machine learning and artificial intelligence methods are emerging as important tools to advance drug discovery and chemoinformatics, including their application to identification of frequent hitters in screening assays. However, the relative performance and complementarity of the Machine Learning and scaffold-based techniques has not yet been comprehensively compared. In this study, we analysed filters based on the privileged scaffolds with filters built using machine learning. Our results demonstrate that machine-learning methods provide more accurate filters for identification of frequent hitters in AlphaScreen assays than scaffold-based methods and can be easily redeveloped once new data are measured. We present highly accurate models to identify frequent hitters in AlphaScreen assays.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据