4.4 Review

Inborn errors of purine and pyrimidine metabolism: A guide to diagnosis

期刊

MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM
卷 136, 期 3, 页码 164-176

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2022.02.007

关键词

Encephalopathy; Hypotonia; Myopathy; Purines; Pyrimidines; Seizures

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inborn errors of purine and pyrimidine metabolism are often overlooked, but their diagnosis is crucial for genetic counseling and specific treatment that can slow or reverse clinical symptoms. This review provides a practical guideline for the suspicion and investigation of these errors, emphasizing risk factors, important examination findings, and appropriate biochemical investigation in children.
Inborn errors of purine and pyrimidine (P/P) metabolism are under-reported and rarely mentioned in the general literature or in clinical practice, as well as in reviews dedicated to other inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs). However, their diagnosis is important because genetic counseling can be provided and, in some cases, specific treatment exists that may slow or even reverse clinical signs. The purpose of this review is to provide a practical guideline on the suspicion and investigation of inborn errors of P/P metabolism. Failure of a physician to recognize the presence of these disorders may be devastating for affected infants and children because of its permanent effects in the patient, and for their parents because of implications for future offspring. Diagnosis is crucial because genetic counseling can be provided and, in some cases, specific treatment can be offered that may slow or even reverse clinical symptoms. This review highlights the risk factors in the history, the important examination findings, and the appropriate biochemical investigation of the child. Herein we describe the approach to the diagnosis of P/P disorders and emphasize clinical situations in which physicians should consider these diseases as diagnostic possibilities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据