4.5 Article

Blocking PI3K p110β Attenuates Development of PTEN-Deficient Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER RESEARCH
卷 20, 期 5, 页码 673-685

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-21-0322

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01 CA187918, R35 CA231945, R35 CA210057, P50CA211024, DoD PC160357, DoD PC180582, P50 CA090381-14]
  2. Prostate Cancer Foundation
  3. SC COBRE in Oxidants, Redox Balance and Stress Signaling Pilot Projects Program [1P30CM140964]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research findings suggest that blocking p110 beta can slow down the progression of castration-resistant prostate cancer and reduce tumor growth. Combining p110 beta with other inhibitors shows potential for treating CRPC.
A common outcome of androgen deprivation in prostate cancer therapy is disease relapse and progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) via multiple mechanisms. To gain insight into the recent clinical findings that highlighted genomic alterations leading to hyperactivation of PI3K, we examined the roles of the commonly expressed p110 catalytic isoforms of PI3K in a murine model of Pten-null invasive CRPC. While blocking p110 alpha had negligible effects in the development of Pten-null invasive CRPC, either genetic or pharmacologic perturbation of p110 beta dramatically slowed CRPC initiation and progression. Once fully established, CRPC tumors became partially resistant to p110 beta inhibition, indicating the acquisition of new dependencies. Driven by our genomic analyses highlighting potential roles for the p110 beta/RAC/PAK1 and beta-catenin pathways in CRPC, we found that combining p110 beta with RAC/PAK1 or tankyrase inhibitors significantly reduced the growth of murine and human CRPC organoids in vitro and in vivo. Because p110 beta activity is dispensable for most physiologic processes, our studies support novel therapeutic strategies both for preventing disease progression into CRPC and for treating CRPC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据