4.8 Article

Selection for Cell Yield Does Not Reduce Overflow Metabolism in Escherichia coli

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 39, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msab345

关键词

overflow metabolism; r; k selection; yield; emulsion culturing; metabolic strategy; cell size; experimental evolution

资金

  1. NWO-VIDI project [864.11.011]
  2. Novo Nordisk Foundation through the Center for Biosustainability at the Technical University of Denmark [NNF10CC1016517, NNF20CC0035580]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Overflow metabolism, although often considered inefficient, can still be advantageous in promoting high growth rates and fitness. Experimental evolution of bacteria without nutrient competition showed that overflow metabolism led to an increase in cell yield despite a reduction in cell size, demonstrating that this metabolic strategy can be favorable even in the absence of nutrient competition.
Overflow metabolism is ubiquitous in nature, and it is often considered inefficient because it leads to a relatively low biomass yield per consumed carbon. This metabolic strategy has been described as advantageous because it supports high growth rates during nutrient competition. Here, we experimentally evolved bacteria without nutrient competition by repeatedly growing and mixing millions of parallel batch cultures of Escherichia coli. Each culture originated from a water-in-oil emulsion droplet seeded with a single cell. Unexpectedly we found that overflow metabolism (acetate production) did not change. Instead, the numerical cell yield during the consumption of the accumulated acetate increased as a consequence of a reduction in cell size. Our experiments and a mathematical model show that fast growth and overflow metabolism, followed by the consumption of the overflow metabolite, can lead to a higher numerical cell yield and therefore a higher fitness compared with full respiration of the substrate. This provides an evolutionary scenario where overflow metabolism can be favorable even in the absence of nutrient competition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据