4.7 Article

An environmentally friendly xylanase-assisted pretreatment for cellulose nanofibrils isolation from sugarcane bagasse by high-pressure homogenization

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 82, 期 -, 页码 149-160

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.11.064

关键词

Sugarcane bagasse; Steam explosion; Xylanase; High-pressure homogenization; Cellulose nanofibrils

资金

  1. National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), Thailand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) from sugarcane bagasse (SCB) were isolated by high-pressure homogenization. Xylanase-assisted pretreatment after steam explosion was studied to investigate its effect on various cellulose properties such as bleaching times, reduced chemical use and color in the subsequent bleaching stage. High cellulose contents were successfully extracted from SCB with xylanase-assisted pretreatment; moreover, xylanase-treated fibers exhibited decreased bleaching times, a 44% reduction in the amount of chemicals used and had a satisfactory whiteness index compared to untreated fibers. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis revealed significant increases in crystallinity index for xylanase-assisted pretreatment fibers. Characterization of the fibers by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) indicated that the fiber diameters decreased with each treatment stage; the final CNFs obtained at 15,000 psi for 30 passes primarily ranged from 5 to 10 nm in diameter. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) indicated that CNFs have lower thermal stability than raw cellulose fibers. These results indicate that xylanase-assisted pretreatment with high-pressure homogenization is an environmentally friendly method to isolate CNFs and clearly demonstrates the potential of enzymatic pretreatment for reducing environmental contamination, especially with regard to toxic chlorine compounds that are required for the bleaching process. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据