4.2 Article

Performance of recent PRINTO criteria versus current ILAR criteria for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A single-centre experience

期刊

MODERN RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 187-193

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mr/roab115

关键词

Classification criteria; ILAR criteria; PRINTO criteria; systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the performances of recent criteria proposed by the Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) compared to the current International League of Associations for Rheumatology criteria. The study found that the Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization criteria had higher sensitivity but comparable specificity compared to the International League of Associations for Rheumatology criteria in diagnosing sJIA.
Objectives The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performances of recently proposed Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization criteria versus current International League of Associations for Rheumatology criteria for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA). Methods The study was performed at the Department of Pediatric Rheumatology in Istanbul Faculty of Medicine with a retrospective design, covering the date range 2010-2021. Patients diagnosed with sJIA, Kawasaki disease and common autoinflammatory diseases were included. Both the International League of Associations for Rheumatology and Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization classification criteria were applied to each patient and cross-checked with expert rheumatologist diagnosis. Results Eighty-two patients with sJIA were compared against 189 (74 Kawasaki disease, 83 familial Mediterranean fever, 16 mevalonate kinase deficiency, 10 cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes, and 6 tumour necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome) patients. The Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization criteria demonstrated higher sensitivity (62.2% vs 80.5%, P =.003) but comparable specificity (90.5% vs 91%) as regards the International League of Associations for Rheumatology criteria. Conclusions The revised criteria appear to enhance the ability to provide early recognition and pertinent classification of sJIA. No superiority was observed in segregating sJIA from common autoinflammatory diseases and Kawasaki disease, namely in terms of specificity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据