4.7 Article

Novel nanofibrillated cellulose/chitosan nanoparticles nanocomposites films and their use for paper coating

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 93, 期 -, 页码 219-226

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.12.006

关键词

Nanofibrillated cellulose; Rice straw; Chitosan nanoparticles; Nanocomposites; Paper coating

资金

  1. National Research Centre [10130103]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel nanocomposites films were prepared from TEMPO-oxidized nanofibrillated cellulose isolated from rice straw, chitosan nanoparticles (CHNP), and glycerol by solution casting. The percentage of chitosan nanoparticles ranged from 2.5 to 20% while a fixed ratio of glycerol (25%) was added. The effect of chitosan nanoparticles on porosity, tensile strength properties, water vapor permeability, grease-proof, and antimicrobial properties was studied. The results showed that addition of chitosan nanoparticles can improve tensile strength properties, reduce porosity, and impart NFC antimicrobial properties against Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus), Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli), and yeast (Saccharomyces cervisiae). CHNP did not affect WVP or grease-proof properties of NFC films. The mixture containing CNF and 10% CHNP was used for paper coating and, the effect of coating on tensile strength, porosity, water vapor permeability, water absorption, and grease-proof properties of paper sheets was studied. The results showed coating of paper sheets with thin film of NFC or NFC/CHNP can improve tensile strength properties, decrease porosity and water absorption, and increase grease-proof properties of paper sheets but did not affect their WVP. Presence of CHNP in the coating mixture resulted in higher tensile strength properties of coated paper sheets than in case of using NFC alone but no noticeable differences were found regarding porosity, WVP, grease proof, and water absorption of paper sheets coated with NFC or NFC/CHNP under the conditions used. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据