4.7 Article

A novel cut-off grade method for increasing the sustainability of underground metalliferous mining operations

期刊

MINERALS ENGINEERING
卷 172, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107168

关键词

Cut-off grade; Underground mining; Mine planning; Sustainability; Pre-concentration; Mathematical formulation

资金

  1. University of Queensland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Determining a cut-off grade is crucial in mining operations due to its role in separating waste material from valuable ore, especially with lower grades in an uncertain market. Implementing pre-concentration systems before main processing can increase sustainability and resource utilization, potentially leading to a reduction in mine cut-off grade. The integration of pre-concentration systems and a novel method for calculating underground cut-off grade are shown to improve profitability, efficiency, and sustainability in underground operations.
The determination of a cut-off grade is considered to be one of the main steps in the design and strategic planning of mining operations. This is due to its role in distinguishing between waste material and valuable ore. This becomes increasingly important as the mining industry is facing lower grades within an uncertain market. The implementation of pre-concentration systems prior to main processing has significant potential to increase the sustainability and resource utilisation of mining operations, which can result in the reduction of mine cut-off grade. This paper reviews the technical concepts of integration of pre-concentration systems into underground mines and presents a novel method for underground cut-off grade calculation. The proposed model is implemented on a sublevel stoping operation to illustrate the impacts and advantages of the underground preconcentration integration. The outputs of this study and investigation of various scenarios prove an increase in the profitability, efficiency and sustainability of the underground operations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据