4.7 Article

Growth of spring camelina (Camelina sativa) under deficit irrigation in Western Nebraska

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 83, 期 -, 页码 118-123

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.12.017

关键词

Oilseed; Biodiesel; Omega-3; Omega-9

资金

  1. USDA Risk Management Assessment program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The High Plains of the U.S.A. is subject to periodic drought where low-water using crops are desired. Camelina is a potential biofuel crop that may be suitable for this region. The objective was to determine the growth, seed yield, and oil characteristic of camelina exposed to four levels of applied water in western Nebraska. The cultivar Cheyenne was exposed to rain-fed only (RF), and irrigated with 10 (LI), 20 (MI), and 30 (HI) cm water. Irrigation increased plant growth as measured by canopy height, stem length, and canopy weight. Maximum height (70-80 cm) was reached by 10 weeks after planting (WAP) with a total of 23 cm of applied water or 13 cm of irrigation. By 13 WAP, canopy and pod fresh weights were increased by 40-50% by the MI and HI irrigations. Likewise, at harvest (13 WAP), plant dry weight was increased by 50% by the two higher irrigation levels. Seed yields were increased by each incremental increase in irrigation from 890 kg/ha for RF to 2540 for HI, a 2.85-fold increase. Oil content was not affected by irrigating at the LI or MI but was increased only by the HI irrigation level. The fatty acid profile was altered by irrigation with an increase in the major constituent, linolenic acid, and a corresponding decrease in two other large constituents, oleic and linoleic acids. There also was a slight increase in the minor constituent of erucic acid. The growth pattern of camelina showed that 23 cm of applied water would be required for healthy plant growth but as much as 43 cm would be needed for maximum yield. The results indicate that camelina could be grown successfully in western Nebraska, supplying oil for fuel and cooking. (c) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据