4.4 Article

Pulsatility damping in the microcirculation: Basic pattern and modulating factors

期刊

MICROVASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 139, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.mvr.2021.104259

关键词

Pulsatility damping; One-dimensional model; Microcirculation; Rat mesentery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that blood flow pulsatility is predominantly damped at the arteriolar side and remains at a low level at the venular side. Pulsatility is sensitive to pulse frequency, vascular viscous resistance, and vascular compliance. Viscoelasticity of the vessel wall or wave propagation and reflection have little contribution to pulsatility damping.
Blood flow pulsatility is an important determinant of macro-and microvascular physiology. Pulsatility is damped largely in the microcirculation, but the characteristics of this damping and the factors that regulate it have not been fully elucidated yet. Applying computational approaches to real microvascular network geometry, we examined the pattern of pulsatility damping and the role of potential damping factors, including pulse frequency, vascular viscous resistance, vascular compliance, viscoelastic behavior of the vessel wall, and wave propagation and reflection. To this end, three full rat mesenteric vascular networks were reconstructed from intravital microscopic recordings, a one-dimensional (1D) model was used to reproduce pulsatile properties within the network, and potential damping factors were examined by sensitivity analysis. Results demonstrate that blood flow pulsatility is predominantly damped at the arteriolar side and remains at a low level at the venular side. Damping was sensitive to pulse frequency, vascular viscous resistance and vascular compliance, whereas viscoelasticity of the vessel wall or wave propagation and reflection contributed little to pulsatility damping. The present results contribute to our understanding of mechanical forces and their regulation in the microcirculation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据