4.4 Article

Effects of change of oxygen vacancy on hysteresis voltage and stability under time-temperature dependence positive bias stress in amorphous SZTO transistors

期刊

MICROELECTRONIC ENGINEERING
卷 253, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2021.111678

关键词

Oxygen flow rate; PBTS; A-SZTO; Hysteresis; Stability; TFTs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the voltage hysteresis and instability under time-dependent positive bias stress in amorphous silicon zinc tin oxide thin-film transistors by varying the oxygen flow rate during channel material growth. Results showed that increasing the oxygen flow rate widened the voltage hysteresis and affected the electrical stability. This could be attributed to the increase in acceptor-like trap states induced by the oxygen flow rate during deposition.
The study on voltage hysteresis (VHys) and instability under the time dependence positive bias stress at a fixed temperature (PBTS) in amorphous silicon zinc tin oxide (a-SZTO) thin-film transistors (TFTs) has been investigated by varying the oxygen flow rate (OFR) during the a-SZTO channel material growth via radio frequency (RF) sputtering. Current-voltage (I-V) measurement was initially taken to study the VHys, which revealed that the VHys was widened by increasing the OFR. The threshold voltage (V-th) shift in a-SZTO TFTs and the impact of OFR on electrical properties and electrical stability of a-SZTO TFTs were analyzed by the PBTS measurement. From PBTS, we observed that the threshold voltage shift difference (Delta V-th) increases as the OFR increases. We conclude that a plausible reason for these results may be due to the acceptor-like trap states induced by OFR. The density of Gaussian-like states, excess or weakly bonded oxygen acting as acceptor-like states, is increased by increasing OFR during the deposition of channel material. These results are expected to be of general importance for future works of other amorphous oxide based TFTs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据