4.7 Article

Label-free electrochemical biosensor for determination of procalcitonin based on graphene-wrapped Co nanoparticles encapsulated in carbon nanobrushes coupled with AuPtCu nanodendrites

期刊

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 189, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-022-05179-8

关键词

Label-free immunosensor; Nanobrushes; Nanodendrites; Synergistic signal magnification; Procalcitonin

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LQ20B050001]
  2. Zhejiang Public Welfare Technology Application Research Project [LGG19B050001]
  3. National Students' Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program of Zhejiang Normal University [202110345022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A label-free electrochemical immunosensor was developed for quantitative detection of procalcitonin using AuPtCu nanodendrites and graphene-wrapped Co nanoparticles. The sensor exhibits efficient catalysis and low detection limit, providing valuable guidance for bioassays and early diagnosis.
A new label-free electrochemical immunosensor was constructed for quantitative detection of procalcitonin (PCT), by employing AuPtCu nanodendrites (AuPtCu NDs, prepared by a one-pot solvothermal method) and graphene-wrapped Co nanoparticles encapsulated in 3D N-doped carbon nanobrushes (G-Co@ NCNBs), obtained by self-catalyzed chemical vapor deposition as immune-sensing platform. Impressively, the home-made nanocomposite enlarged the highly accessible active sites and promoted the mass/electron transport, in turn showing the efficient synergistic catalysis towards H2O2 reduction, combined by greatly increasing the loading capacity of the PCT antibody (Ab). The as-constructed sensor displayed a dynamic linear range of 0.0001 similar to 100 ng mL(-1) along with an ultra-low limit of detection (LOD = 0.011 pg mL(-1), S/N= 3) and was further explored for determination of PCT in a diluted serum sample with acceptable results. The sensor provides some valuable guidelines for bioassay and early diagnosis of sepsis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据