4.7 Article

Determination of fipronil and its metabolites in egg samples by UHPLC coupled with Q-Exactive high resolution mass spectrometry after magnetic solid-phase extraction

期刊

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 169, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2021.106540

关键词

Fipronil; Egg; Metabolites; Fe3O4@nSiO(2)@mSiO(2)-PDA; Magnetic solid phase extraction; UHPLC-Q-Exactive HRMS

资金

  1. Science and Technology Programs of Sichuan Province of China [2017SZDZX0017]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KFJ-BRP-030]
  3. US National Institutes of Health [1U554MD015929-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel MSPE method combined with UHPLC-Q-Exactive HRMS was proposed for determination of fipronil and its metabolites in egg samples, utilizing Fe3O4@nSiO(2)@mSiO(2)-PDA as the adsorbent. The method showed good linearity, high sensitivity, adequate recovery, and repeatability, and was successfully applied for determination of fipronil and its metabolites in egg samples.
A novel, rapid and simple magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE) method combined with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled with Q-Exactive high resolution mass spectrometry (UHPLC-Q-Exactive HRMS) was proposed for determination of fipronil and its metabolites in egg samples. In this study, novel polydopamine functionalized magnetic core-shell mesoporous silica nanoparticles (Fe3O4@nSiO(2)@mSiO(2)-PDA) were used as MSPE adsorbent for purification and enrichment of fipronil and its metabolites for the first time. The proposed method showed a good linearity (R-2 >= 0.997), high sensitivity (limit of detection in the range of 0.002-0.004 mu g/kg and limit of quantification in the range of 0.006-0.010 mu g/kg), adequate recovery (80.6-95.3%) and repeatability (intra-day precision in the range of 2.2-6.7% and inter-day precision in the range of 4.4-10.7%). Finally, the developed MSPE-UHPLC-Q-Exactive HRMS method was successfully applied for determination of fipronil and its metabolites in egg samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据