4.7 Article

Identification of chemoreceptor proteins for amino acids involved in host plant infection in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci 6605

期刊

MICROBIOLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 253, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2021.126869

关键词

Amino acids; Chemoreceptor; MCP; Pseudomonas syringae; Virulence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, four dCache_1 type MCPs in Pta6605 were characterized, with PscA, PscB, and PscC2 responsible for sensing amino acids. Mutant strains of PscA, PscB, and PscC2 showed reduced chemotaxis to most amino acids, as well as effects on cellular functions and virulence in the host tobacco plant.
Chemotaxis is crucial for Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci (Pta) 6605 to evoke disease in tobacco plants. Pta6605 harbors more than fifty genes for methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (mcp), but almost all are functionally uncharacterized. Previously we identified a dCache_1 type MCP in Pta6605 that mediates chemotaxis to y-aminobutyric acid, called McpG. In this study, we characterized four more dCache_1 type MCPs, three of which, PscA, PscB, and PscC2, are responsible for sensing amino acids. Using a capillary chemotaxis assay, we observed that PscA, PscB, and PscC2 mutant strains had reduced chemotaxis to most amino acids, indicating that PscA and PscB mediate chemotaxis to 14 amino acids, while PscC2 has a slightly narrower ligand recognition, mediating chemotaxis to 12 amino acids. Other cellular functions were also affected in ApscB and ApscC2: swarming motility was reduced, and biofilm formation was increased. Furthermore, ApscB and ApscC2 but not ApscA had reduced virulence in the host tobacco plant. On the other hand, ApscC1 was defective in motility and did not even respond to yeast extract and was unable to cause disease. These findings supported the idea that the chemosensory pathway correlated with virulence-related phenotypes. Amino acids are abundant in tobacco apoplast; having multiple MCPs appears to support the invasion of Pta6605 into the plant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据