4.6 Article

Numerical Model of Rapidly Solidified Droplets of Al-33 Wt Pct Cu Eutectic Growth

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-021-06504-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Holistic Innovation in Additive Manufacturing (HI-AM) Network

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the study, rapid solidification of Al-Cu droplets of eutectic composition using Impulse Atomization was observed, revealing two different morphologies of eutectic structures. A model of eutectic solidification was developed, showing good agreement between experimental measurements and the model for the regular eutectic spacing, but a difference in the predicted spacing of the undulated eutectic, attributed to possible coarsening during the solidification process.
Rapid solidification of Al-Cu droplets of eutectic composition was carried out using Impulse Atomization (a type of drop tube). Two distinct morphologies were observed: an irregular undulated eutectic assumed to form during recalescence, followed by a regular lamellar eutectic. The volume fraction of each morphology was measured and used to deduce the nucleation undercooling based on the hypercooling limit. A model of the eutectic solidification was developed assuming that the kinetics of the undulated and regular regions is the same and follows scaling laws established experimentally. The simulated solid fraction forming during recalescence matches the experimental undulated eutectic fraction. Furthermore, the heat balance confirms the adiabatic nature of the solidification during recalescence. Good agreement is found between the model and experimental measurements of lamellar spacing for the regular eutectic. However, the predicted spacing of the undulated eutectic is much lower than what is observed experimentally. This difference as well as the nature of this morphology is attributed to coarsening during the remaining of solidification of the very fine eutectic formed during recalescence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据