4.7 Article

Miscanthus x giganteus as a biomass feedstock grown on municipal sewage sludge

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 81, 期 -, 页码 72-82

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.11.052

关键词

Miscanthus x giganteus; Biomass yield; Harvest date; Propagation; Sewage sludge application

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Poland [N N310080336]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Utilization of sewage sludge seems to be an attractive option for fertilization of bioenergy crops; therefore the objective of this study was to determine the effect of different doses of municipal sewage sludge on yields and bioenergy feedstock characteristics of Miscanthus x giganteus (Greef et Deu.). In a six-year field experiment, located on loamy clay, five doses of sludge (0, 10, 20, 40, 60 Mg DM ha(-1)), two methods of plantation establishment (by rhizome divisions and micropropagation), and three dates of biomass harvesting (autumn, winter, spring) were tested in order to determine which one should be recommended in cultivation of this species. Dry matter yields of giant miscanthus increased each year and exceeded 25 Mg ha(-1) in an optimized system within this study. It was found out that application of lower doses of sludge (10-20 Mg DM ha(-1)), resulted in obtaining the highest yield of biomass. On the other hand, the content, uptake and bioaccumulation factor of macronutrients contained in the sludge increased along with increasing dose of applied biosolids. M. giganteus biomass was characterized by favorable parameters: net and gross calorific values were in the range of 16.2-16.8 MJ kg(-1) and 17.7-18.2 MJ kg(-4), respectively. The highest energy value of biomass yield was obtained in the case of rhizomes used for plantation establishment, especially in the treatments with 20 Mg DM ha(-1) of sludge application. Spring harvest improved quality of biomass for thermochemical conversion, but at the same time significantly (by 22%) reduced yields, whereas winter harvest resulted in biomass loss without its quality amelioration compared to the autumn one. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据