4.7 Article

On the chemical aspects of the biodelignification of wheat straw with Pycnoporus sanguineus and its combined effects with the presence of Candida tropicalis

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 91, 期 -, 页码 315-322

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.07.035

关键词

Pycnoporus sanguineus; Candida tropicalis; Wheat straw; Lignin; Biodelignification chemistry; Chemical structure

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [31070524]
  2. Major State Basic Research Development Program of China [2010CB732205]
  3. Doctorate Fellowship Foundation of Nanjing Forestry University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pycnoporus sanguineus (Ps) and Candida tropicalis (Ct) can selectively degrade the lignin and hemicellulose in lignocellulosic cells respectively; Ps-Ct mixed fermentation may improve the multiphase reaction performance of lignin in the cell walls. Alkaline nitrobenzene oxidation, ozonation and infrared spectroscopy, which are the in-situ analytical techniques of lignin in the cells, were used to characterize the delignification kinetics, the reactions of the non-condensed, beta-O-4 structures and their stereochemistry of lignin in wheat straw in Ps and Ps-Ct fermentations. Results indicated that the biodelignification processes in Ps and Ps-Ct fermentations of wheat straw, being divided into a fast phase and a following slow phase, had the characteristics of a pseudo-first-order reaction in both the phases. The lignin reaction pathways in Ps and Ps-Ct mainly included the cleavage of ring, C alpha-C beta, beta-O-4, and the cleavage and polymerization of 5-5'. Compared with Ps fermentation, Ps-Ct fermentation enhanced the biodegradation of condensed, beta-O-4 structures and threo beta-O-4 structures in the lignin in the fast phase. A proposal scheme of biodelignification by Ps and Ps-Ct is outlined for the first time. These results will be helpful for the understanding and application of lignocellulosic biomass by mixed fermentations. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据