4.5 Article

Usefulness of delta neutrophil index as a biomarker to predict postoperative complication in patients who underwent esophagectomy A case-control study

期刊

MEDICINE
卷 100, 期 51, 页码 -

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028311

关键词

biomarkers; delta neutrophil index; esophagectomy; postoperative complications

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our study showed that postoperative Delta Neutrophil Index (DNI) can serve as an essential early predictive biomarker for complications after esophagectomy, with DNI on postoperative day 2 being significantly associated with increased risk of complications.
Esophagectomy demonstrates a high incidence of complications owing to its complexity and invasiveness; hence, early detection of complications is important. We aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the delta neutrophil index (DNI) for complications after esophagectomy. We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent esophagectomy in the department of general surgery at a single institution between January 2011 and October 2020. Patient characteristics, laboratory findings, and clinical outcomes were assessed. Fifty-seven patients were enrolled in this study, of whom 31 (54.4%) had complications. The complication group had significantly longer mean mechanical ventilation, hospital stay and intensive care unit stay periods, and higher acute physiology, age, chronic health evaluation score and mortality rate than the noncomplication group. DNI on postoperative day (POD) 2 was also significantly higher in the complication group. Logistic regression analysis showed that DNI on POD 2 was an independent risk factor associated with the complications. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the area under curve of DNI on POD 2 was 0.712 (cutoff value: 2.15%, sensitivity 61.5%, and specificity 70.8%). Our study indicated that postoperative DNI can be useful as an early predictive biomarker of the complications after esophagectomy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据