4.3 Article

Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of 4-Aminoantipyrine Analogues

期刊

MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 26-35

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1573406416666201106105303

关键词

4-Aminoantipyridine; spectroscopy; anticonvulsant; antibacterial; cytotoxicity; molecular docking

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The simply synthesized aminoantipyrine derivatives show a variety of biological activities like antibacterial and anticancer effects. In addition, this is the first study demonstrating that 4-aminoantipyrine derivatives show an anticonvulsant activity.
Objectives: The aim of the present study is to carry out a simple synthesis of aminoantipyrine analogues and exploration of their antibacterial, cytotoxic, and anticonvulsant potential. Methods: The compounds were characterized employing multi-spectroscopic methods. The in vitro pharmacological response of a series of bacteria was screened employing serial dilution method. The derivatives were screened against maximal electro-shock for their anticonvulsant activity. Molecular docking was carried out to optimize the interaction of the compounds with HPV16-E7 receptors. Further, the in vitro cytotoxicity was tested against human cervical cancer (SiHa) cell lines. Results: The compounds show protection against maximal electroshock, esp. 3-nirto- and 4-methyl-3-nitrobenzamido derivatives. In addition, they reveal appreciable DNA cleavage activities and interactions with HPV16-E7 protein receptors, esp. 3,5-dinitro- and 4-methyl-3-nitrobenzamido derivatives. Furthermore, they show potent activity against cervical cancer cells (LD 50 value up to 1200 in the case of 4-methyl-3-nitrobenzamido derivative and an inhibition of a maximum of similar to 97% of cells). Conclusion: The simply synthesized aminoantipyrine derivatives show a variety of biological activities like antibacterial and anticancer effects. In addition, this is the first study demonstrating that 4-aminoantipyrine derivatives show an anticonvulsant activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据