4.6 Article

AAPM task group report 302: Surface-guided radiotherapy

期刊

MEDICAL PHYSICS
卷 49, 期 4, 页码 E82-E112

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mp.15532

关键词

deep inspiration breath hold; frameless radiosurgery; risk assessment; surface guided radiotherapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The clinical use of surface imaging has significantly increased for patient positioning, motion monitoring, and beam gating. Task Group 302 commissioned by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine reviewed the current uses and emerging applications of surface imaging in clinical settings, providing technical guidelines and recommendations.
The clinical use of surface imaging has increased dramatically, with demonstrated utility for initial patient positioning, real-time motion monitoring, and beam gating in a variety of anatomical sites. The Therapy Physics Subcommittee and the Imaging for Treatment Verification Working Group of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine commissioned Task Group 302 to review the current clinical uses of surface imaging and emerging clinical applications. The specific charge of this task group was to provide technical guidelines for clinical indications of use for general positioning, breast deep-inspiration breath hold treatment, and frameless stereotactic radiosurgery. Additionally, the task group was charged with providing commissioning and on-going quality assurance (QA) requirements for surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) as part of a comprehensive QA program including risk assessment. Workflow considerations for other anatomic sites and for computed tomography simulation, including motion management, are also discussed. Finally, developing clinical applications, such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or proton radiotherapy, are presented. The recommendations made in this report, which are summarized at the end of the report, are applicable to all video-based SGRT systems available at the time of writing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据