4.7 Article

Friction modeling and compensation for haptic master manipulator based on deep Gaussian process

期刊

MECHANISM AND MACHINE THEORY
卷 166, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104480

关键词

Friction modeling; Deep Gaussian process; Haptics; Surgical robot

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2017YFB1304202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates friction modeling and compensation for haptic master manipulator in a robot-assisted minimally invasive surgical system. Based on deep Gaussian process (DGP), the proposed algorithm can accurately predict and compensate friction without the need for explicit friction models, thus overcoming drawbacks associated with model-based methods. Through implicit posterior variational inference, the algorithm can effectively handle parametric uncertainty in the dynamics of the haptic master manipulator, demonstrating superior performance in representing and compensating friction effects compared to existing alternatives.
This paper investigates friction modeling and compensation for haptic master manipulator used in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgical system. Friction modeling and compensation is based on deep Gaussian process (DGP) and it does not require the utilization of explicit friction models. Therefore, the proposed friction modeling and compensation algorithm can circumvent the drawbacks associated with model-based methods. Through the adoption of implicit posterior variational inference, the proposed algorithm can accurately predict and compensate friction even when there exists parametric uncertainty in the dynamics of the haptic master manipulator. The effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed approach is validated experimentally through the robot-assisted minimally invasive surgical system. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms several existing alternatives in representing and compensating friction effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据