4.7 Article

Hybrid fitting-numerical method for determining strain-hardening behavior of sheet metals

期刊

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS
卷 161, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2021.104031

关键词

Strain hardening behavior; Curve-fitting method; Inverse finite element analysis; Kim-Tuan hardening law; Sheet metals

资金

  1. Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2019R1A2C1011224]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a hybrid method combining curve-fitting and inverse finite element analysis to identify the parameters of the Kim-Tuan hardening model over large strain ranges. By calibrating the hardening laws, the stress-strain relationship of sheet metals can be effectively captured.
The uniaxial tensile test is well-established for experimentally identifying the stress-strain relationship for sheet metals. Conventionally, true stress-strain data obtained from the test are used to identify the hardening law's parameters using the curve-fitting method. Extrapolation using the identified hardening law describes the stress-strain relationship at large strains; however, it varies widely, depending on the selection of hardening models and their identified parameters. This study presents a hybrid method incorporating the curve-fitting method and inverse finite element analysis to identify the Kim-Tuan hardening model's parameters over large strain ranges. Here, the curve-fitting method enforces the identified hardening law's accuracy in the pre-necking range. Simultaneously, the inverse finite element analysis method maintains the goodness of the post-necking prediction. The proposed method is used to calibrate hardening laws for DP780 and AA6016-T651 sheet metals subjected to uniaxial tensile tests at room and warm temperatures, respectively. The calibrated hardening laws capture the force-displacement curves of both materials well, validating the ability of the presented method in practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据