4.7 Article

Asymmetric viscoelastic metamaterials for broad bandgap design and unidirectional zero reflection

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108101

关键词

Viscoelastic metamaterial; Generalized Maxwell model; Locally resonant bandgap; Exceptional point; Non-Hermitian

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11672004, 11991033]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An asymmetric viscoelastic metamaterial is proposed for isolating elastic waves and achieving zero reflection, using a generalized Maxwell model to accurately describe the material's viscoelastic response. The analysis shows a quasi-bandgap formed between the two resonators, which can broaden the bandwidth of wave isolation.
We propose an asymmetric viscoelastic metamaterial constructed from a unit with two distinct resonators selected to isolate elastic waves in a large coupled locally resonant bandgap (LRBG) and simultaneously realize designed unidirectional zero reflection (UZR). A generalized Maxwell model, as opposed to a Kelvin-Voigt model or standard linear solid model, is adopted to more accurately describe actual linearly viscoelastic mechanical response in both the epoxy and rubber components over the frequency range of application. The analysis of the band structure of this asymmetric viscoelastic matamaterial shows that there is a quasi-bandgap formed between the two LRGBs when they are close, allowing a broadening of the bandwidth of wave isolation. Interface response theory and finite element methods are used to show that the quasi-bandgap forms in the frequency domain for both discrete and continuous metamaterials. Exploiting this asymmetric viscoelastic metamaterial, an exceptional point with UZR for longitudinal waves in the non-Hermitian system is achieved by tuning the masses of two oscillators in the unit. The proposed multifunctional metamaterial may have significant potential in vibration/wave control and guided wave based non-destructive testing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据