4.7 Article

Sampling methods for solving Bayesian model updating problems: A tutorial

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107760

关键词

Bayesian inference; Model updating; Markov Chain Monte Carlo; Transitional Markov Chain Monte Carlo; Sequential Monte Carlo; DLR-AIRMOD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This tutorial paper reviews the use of advanced Monte Carlo sampling methods in Bayesian model updating for engineering applications, introducing different methods and comparing their performance. Three case studies demonstrate the advantages and limitations of these sampling techniques in parameter identification, posterior distribution sampling, and stochastic identification of model parameters.
This tutorial paper reviews the use of advanced Monte Carlo sampling methods in the context of Bayesian model updating for engineering applications. Markov Chain Monte Carlo, Transitional Markov Chain Monte Carlo, and Sequential Monte Carlo methods are introduced, applied to different case studies and finally their performance is compared. For each of these methods, numerical implementations and their settings are provided. Three case studies with increased complexity and challenges are presented showing the advantages and limitations of each of the sampling techniques under review. The first case study presents the parameter identification for a spring-mass system under a static load. The second case study presents a 2-dimensional bi-modal posterior distribution and the aim is to observe the performance of each of these sampling techniques in sampling from such distribution. Finally, the last case study presents the stochastic identification of the model parameters of a complex and non-linear numerical model based on experimental data. The case studies presented in this paper consider the recorded data set as a single piece of information which is used to make inferences and estimations on time-invariant model parameters. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据