4.7 Article

Characterisation of flavour profile of beef jerky inoculated with different autochthonous lactic acid bacteria using electronic nose and gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry

期刊

MEAT SCIENCE
卷 183, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2021.108658

关键词

Lactic acid bacteria; Beef jerky; Electronic nose; Gas chromatography-ion mobility; spectrometry; Volatile compounds

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31972139]
  2. Natural Science Foundation Project of Hei-longjiang Province [YQ2020C012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that inoculating different autochthonous lactic acid bacteria strains could alter the flavor profiles of beef jerky, reducing levels of certain oxidation by-products and increasing levels of specific compounds. Analysis using electronic nose and gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry could effectively differentiate beef jerky inoculated with different LAB strains.
The flavour profiles of beef jerky separately inoculated with different autochthonous lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains (Lactobacillus sakei BL6, Pediococcus acidilactici BP2, and Lactobacillus fermentum BL11) and a noninoculated control were analysed using electronic nose (E-nose) and gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS). GC-IMS results revealed a total of 42 volatile compounds in beef jerky. Inoculation of the three LAB strains decreased the levels of lipid autoxidation-derived aldehydes (e.g., hexanal, heptanal, octanal, and nonanal). In addition, inoculation of P. acidilactici BP2 increased the levels of esters. Principal component analysis of the E-nose and GC-IMS results could effectively differentiate non-inoculated beef jerky and beef jerky separately inoculated with different LAB strains. Furthermore, there was a high correlation between the E-nose and GC-IMS results, providing a theoretical basis for the identification of different beef jerky formulations and selection of autochthonous starter cultures for beef jerky fermentation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据