4.5 Article

Deep learning model for imbalanced multi-label surface defect classification

期刊

MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 33, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/ac41a6

关键词

defect classification; deep learning; imbalanced dataset; multi-label; high accuracy; low latency

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51875456]
  2. Scientific Research Program Funding from Shaanxi Provincial Education Department [20JC029]
  3. China Scholarship Council [CSC 201706050095, CSC 201506290059]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a novel deep learning model ImDeep for imbalanced multi-label surface defect classification, which integrates three key techniques to improve classification performance and reduce model complexity and latency on small datasets.
Automatic defect classification is vital to ensure product quality, especially for steel production. In the real world, the amount of collected samples with labels is limited due to high labor costs, and the gathered dataset is usually imbalanced, making accurate steel defect classification very challenging. In this paper, a novel deep learning model for imbalanced multi-label surface defect classification, named ImDeep, is proposed. It can be deployed easily in steel production lines to identify different defect types on the steel's surface. ImDeep incorporates three key techniques, i.e. Imbalanced Sampler, Fussy-FusionNet, and Transfer Learning. It improves the model's classification performance with multi-label and reduces the model's complexity over small datasets with low latency. The performance of different fusion strategies and three key techniques of ImDeep is verified. Simulation results prove that ImDeep accomplishes better performance than the state-of-the-art over the public dataset with varied sizes. Specifically, ImDeep achieves about 97% accuracy of steel surface defect classification over a small imbalanced dataset with a low latency, which improves about 10% compared with that of the state-of-the-art.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据