4.7 Article

Performance evaluation of buried pipe under loading using fiber Bragg grating and particle image velocimetry techniques

期刊

MEASUREMENT
卷 186, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110086

关键词

Buried pipe; Surcharge loading; Fiber Bragg grating (FBG); Particle image velocimetry (PIV); Soil-pipe interaction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42077235, 41722209, 41672277]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates the feasibility of using FBG sensors to monitor the behavior of soil-pipe system under surcharge loadings through 1-g plane strain model tests. Three types of soil failure surfaces and two theoretical methods to estimate the ultimate bearing capacity of the soil-pipe system are identified. The evolution of pipe strain measurement under different ground settlements is discussed in detail, and a method is proposed to calculate radial displacements with a relative error below +/- 10%.
Accurate and real-time estimation of underground pipelines' response to external loads is essential, in which the fiber Bragg grating (FBG) technique has shown great potential. A series of 1-g plane strain model tests were conducted to investigate the feasibility of using FBG sensors for monitoring the behavior of the soil-pipe system under surcharge loadings, while particle image velocimetry (PIV) was employed to measure the soil shear strain fields. The test results show three types of soil failure surfaces, i.e., logarithmic spiral, linear, and logarithmic. Regarding various failure modes, two theoretical methods to estimate the ultimate bearing capacity of the soilpipe system are introduced. Detailed discussions are presented regarding the evolution of pipe strain measurement under different ground settlements. Finally, a method is proposed to calculate the radial displacements based on strain measurements for a shallowly buried pipe and a relative error below +/- 10% is obtained in this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据