4.7 Article

Enhanced spectral coherence and its application to bearing fault diagnosis

期刊

MEASUREMENT
卷 188, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110418

关键词

Cyclostationarity; Spectral coherence; Enhanced spectral coherences; Median filtering; Autocorrelation; Bearing fault diagnosis

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [2682021CG003, 2682021CX090]
  2. Independent Project of State Key Laboratory of Traction Power, Southwest Jiaotong University, China [2021TPL-T11, 2020TPL-T08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spectral coherence is a dedicated method for characterizing the cyclostationarity of bearing faults. However, the vibration signal produced by complex mechanical systems often exhibits mixed cyclostationarity, which presents a challenge for fault identification. To address this issue, an enhanced spectral coherence method is proposed in this study.
Spectral coherence (SCoh) is one of the most dedicated methods for characterizing the second-order cyclostationarity of bearing faults. Under the assumption of second-order cyclostationarity, the SCoh of the bearing vibration signal is expected to have non-zero values along lines-determined by fault-related cyclic frequencies. However, the bearing vibration signal produced by a complex mechanical system always exhibits mixed cyclostationarity-a combination of several orders of cyclostationarity, rather than pure second-order cyclostationarity. The fault-unrelated cyclic frequencies exhibiting a series of non-zero elements on the bivariate plane are served as a tricky problem to interfere with the fault identification. To address this issue, an enhanced SCoh is proposed by combining two basic operators designed by using median filtering and autocorrelation, respectively. Analysis of simulated signals, vibration datasets obtained from artificial fault bearing experiments, and accelerated bearing degradation tests are conducted to verify and compare the performance of the improved SCoh.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据