4.7 Article

Upgrade and new applications of the automated high-tech scanning facility PAVICOM for data processing of track detectors

期刊

MEASUREMENT
卷 187, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110244

关键词

Data processing automatization; Image recognition; Nuclear emulsion; Meteorite olivine; Phosphate glass; Muon radiography

资金

  1. State task of the Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences [0023-2019-008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The high-tech automated measuring facility PAVICOM allows for continuous scanning of solid-state track detectors at the modern world standard level. Its versatility enables measurements and primary analysis of data from all types of track detectors. The main technical characteristics achieved provide an increase in efficiency of data processing and scanning speed, allowing for processing data from accelerator experiments, experiments in high-energy physics, astrophysics, and cosmic ray physics.
The high-tech automated measuring facility PAVICOM is presented, which latest upgrade enables to implement the continuous scanning of solid-state track detectors at the modern world standard level. The unique advantage of the facility is its versatility allowing for measurements and primary analysis of data from all types of track detectors processed on optical microscope. On the PAVICOM facility, search and digitization of the charged particle tracks in the detector material, their recognition and tracking, systematization and primary data processing are carried out in fully automated mode on base of the exclusive author software. The main technical characteristics achieved are given, which provide an increase in efficiency of the data processing and a significant improvement the scanning speed. Examples of using the PAVICOM facility for processing data of accelerator experiments, experiments in the field of high-energy physics, astrophysics and cosmic ray physics, and the most significant results obtained are presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据