4.7 Article

Displacement-strain transformation for a variable cross-section beam based on hypergeometric and Meijer-G functions

期刊

MEASUREMENT
卷 187, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110246

关键词

Displacement-strain transformation; Dynamic 3D measurement; Hypergeometric functions; Meijer-G functions; Modal-learning

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11872167, 51775164]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province [1908085J15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper explores the application of modal-learning displacement-strain transformation in predicting the strain of typical uniform beams. A method based on hypergeometric and Meijer-G functions is proposed for beams with variable cross-sections, showing high prediction accuracy in experiments.
The modal-learning displacement-strain transformation has been proved to be able to predict the strain of the typical uniform beam. However, as the complexity of the structure increases, for example, the shape of the beam cross-section changes. The typical displacement-strain transformation is no longer applicable due to the unknown mode function. To further explore this issue, the hypergeometric and Meijer-G functions are used to establish the mode shape function with good structural adaptability. A displacement-strain transformation method based on the hypergeometric and Meijer-G functions is proposed to predict the dynamic strain of the variable cross-section beam. Experiment results demonstrate that the proposed method can solve the problem of full-field strain prediction for beams with variable sections and boost the displacement-strain transformation's theoretical calculation accuracy. Under sinusoidal excitation and random excitation, the strain prediction accuracy reaches 99.69% and 99.25%, respectively. This approach simplifies the preprocessing of the structure, and provides a welcome boost to developing the displacement-strain transformation method in full-field strain measurement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据