4.7 Article

Macro-meso failure characteristics of circular cavity-contained granite under unconventional cyclic loads: A lab-scale testing

期刊

MEASUREMENT
卷 188, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110608

关键词

Cavity-contained rock; Cyclic loads; Acoustic emission; Fracture evolution; CT scanning

资金

  1. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [8202033]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52174069]
  3. National key technologies Research & Development program [2018YFC0808402]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [FRF-TP-20-004A2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cavity orientation affects the lifetime, strength, deformation, damping ratio, and failure modes of rocks, with higher cavity orientation leading to faster damage propagation and lower AE b-value, volumetric strain, and damping ratio. Shear failure is more likely to occur in rocks with high cavity orientation, highlighting the importance of cavity orientation in rock failure analysis.
This work aims to investigate the macro-meso failure and instability mechanism of cavity-contained granite subjected to increasing-amplitude and decreasing-frequency cyclic loads combined with acoustic emission (AE) and X-ray computed tomography (CT) technique. Testing results show the cavity orientation affects rock lifetime, strength, deformation, damping ratio, AE activities and the internal failure pattern. The sudden increase of volumetric strain and abrupt decreases of b-value and damping ratio can issue the fast damage propagation, and their relationships were established. The rock having high cavity orientation has lower AE b-value, volumetric strain and damping ratio. A damage evolution model considering the damage accumulation was proposed based on AE energy that can well fit the experimental data. Post-test CT images highlight the influence of cavity orientation on rock internal failure modes. It is found that shear failure is liable to occur for rock having high cavity orientation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据