4.7 Article

Enhancement of measurement accuracy of discontinuous specular objects with stereo vision deflectometer

期刊

MEASUREMENT
卷 188, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110570

关键词

Three-dimensional measurement; Discontinuous specular surface; Phase measurement deflectometry; Feature matching

资金

  1. EPSRC Future Advanced Metrology Hub [EP/P006930/1]
  2. A Multiscale Digital Twin-Driven Smart Manufacturing System for High Value-Added Products [EP/T024844/1]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52075147]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a method using stereo vision deflectometer for high-precision measurement of discontinuous specular objects. The method improves measurement accuracy through region segmentation and slope integration, and evaluates the relative positions between different surfaces. Experimental results demonstrate the high accuracy of the proposed method.
Phase measurement deflectometry (PMD) is widely used for specular surface measurement. However, when the measured surface is discontinuous, its measurement accuracy will decrease due to the slope integration process in PMD model. This paper proposes a method to realize high-precision measurement of discontinuous specular object using stereo vision deflectometer (SVD). The discontinuous surface is separated into continuous areas by region segmentation method to avoid the integration error of PMD. Then, slope integration is conducted in each continuous surface region to achieve high measurement accuracy. The absolute position of a height reference point (HRP) of each continuous surface is calculated to evaluate the relative positions between different surfaces. The performance of the proposed method is verified by measuring two sample specular objects with discontinuous surfaces. The experimental results show that the continuous surfaces can achieve nanometer level form measurement accuracy, while the absolute height measurement accuracy is in micrometer level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据