4.7 Article

Heating-time effect on electromechanical admittance of surface-bonded PZT sensor for concrete structural monitoring

期刊

MEASUREMENT
卷 184, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109992

关键词

Heating-time effect; Concrete structure; Piezoelectric (PZT) sensor; Electromechanical admittance (EMA); Surface-bonded; Structural health monitoring (SHM)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51808242, 51838006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper conducted numerical and experimental studies to investigate the effect of heating time on the monitoring of concrete structures using surface-bonded piezoelectric (PZT) sensors. The research demonstrated that the heating time had dual dependencies on the EMA signatures, which had an amplified influence on the structural damage detection results. The findings emphasized the importance of considering the time factor when evaluating temperature influence on PZT-based concrete structural monitoring.
This paper carried out numerical and experimental investigations to interpret the heating-time effect on the monitoring of concrete structures using surface-bonded piezoelectric (PZT) sensor. In the numerical study, a novel 3D finite element model of layered concrete cube mounted with PZT patch was generated for analysis of thermal hysteresis effect. In the experimental study, equal-sized concrete cube was casted and continuously heated by 180 mins for electromechanical admittance (EMA) measurements. Phase angle/magnitude in the EMA spectra and its baseline-unvaried and -varied root mean square deviation (RMSD/RMSDk) indices were incorporated to quantify the heating-time effect. Results demonstrated that EMA signatures exhibited dual dependences to both temperature regime and heating time, which adversely inflicted an amplified influence on structural damage detection results as well. The findings promoted the inclusion of time factor when evaluating temperature influence on PZT-based concrete structural monitoring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据