4.7 Article

A reinforcement learning based method for protein's differential scanning calorimetry signal separation

期刊

MEASUREMENT
卷 188, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110391

关键词

Differential scanning calorimetry; Peak separation; Reinforcement learning; Automatic data analysis

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [62104034]
  2. Fundamental Research Fund from Central University [2023012]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [F2020501033]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) is a powerful technique for studying protein stability, and researchers have proposed a method based on reinforcement learning to automatically separate overlapping peaks in the DSC signal, improving the efficiency of DSC data analysis.
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) is a powerful technique to study protein stability, since the DSC test data provides valuable insights to characterize protein folding thermodynamics. Researchers in the drug discovery field need to manually analyze the DSC curves in multiple steps, such as baseline subtraction, data fitting, integration, and domain deconvolution. To improve the efficiency and consistency of data processing, machine learning methods for automatic DSC peak identification and baseline estimation were seen in prior research. However, the DSC's automatic peak separation remained unexplored, despite its significant role in explaining the multi-domain protein unfolding. In this research, we propose a method based on reinforcement learning to separate the overlapping peaks of the DSC signal. We use two types of protein data to verify the effectiveness of this method. It automatically deconvolutes the peak signals into multiple sub-peaks. Our automated analysis method could lead to improved efficiency in DSC signal analysis when high volume data is involved. The code and data for this work can be found at: https://github.com/shuyu-wang/DSC_analysis_peak_separation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据