4.6 Article

Size effect of band gap in semiconductor nanocrystals and nanostructures from density functional theory within HSE06

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2021.106214

关键词

Band gap; Nanoparticles; Nanostructures; DFT; HSE06

资金

  1. Salahaddin University-Erbil [6073/54/7-17122019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new approach based on density functional theory with hybrid functional (HSE06) and modeled lattice expansion of semiconductors has been studied to determine band gap energy for nanoparticles and nanostructures. It was found that as the size decreases, band gap energy increases due to lattice parameter changes, and the lattice parameters are closely related to the size.
A new approach has been studied to determine the band gap energy based on the density functional theory using the hybrid functional (HSE06) with the modeled lattice expansion of semiconductors for both nanoparticles and nanostructures. At the nanoscale, the lattice parameters play a crucial role in determining the band gap energy. The lattice parameters are first determined using theoretical equations for both nanoparticles and nano structures. The influence of size on band gap was explored, and the results suggest that for semiconductors with narrow and moderate band gaps, the band gap increases as the size decreases. When the size of the particle decreases, the spaces between the bands get wider due to the lattice parameters rise as the diameter gets smaller. Nanoparticles and nanostructures show the same trend in band gap energy variation, however band gap energy in nanostructures is lower than nanoparticles of the same size due to increased lattice strain and higher surface to volume ratio in nanoparticles compared to nanostructures of the same size. The coincident between the method calculations with the available experimental data of band gap change indicated that the lattice parameters are dependent with the size, and can be used as a successful way to understand the band gap properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据