4.7 Article

Significant enhancement in tensile strength and work hardening rate in CoCrFeMnNi by adding TiAl particles via selective laser melting

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.142285

关键词

Selective laser melting; High entropy alloy; Titanium aluminide; Microstructure; Deformation mechanism

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program from the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2018YFB0703400]
  2. China's 1000-Youth-Talent Plan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By adding TiAl powder particles into CoCrFeMnNi HEA and processing with selective laser melting, the developed microstructure led to enhancements in 0.2% yield strength, ultimate tensile strength, and strain hardening rates. The presence of microstructural features such as L1(2) domains, intragranular precipitates, and grain boundary precipitates played a key role in improving the mechanical properties of the samples.
In this study, 4 at.% Ti-48Al-2Cr-2Nb (TiAl) powder particles were added into CoCrFeMnNi high entropy alloy (HEA) and processed by selective laser melting (SLM) followed by hot isostatic pressing and ageing with the aim of enhancing its strengths. It was found that the as-developed HEA-TiAl sample shows a complex microstructure which is composed of near-equiaxed gamma grains embedded with long-range ordered (LRO) L1(2) domains, various intragranular precipitates including Al2O3, B2, Heusler particles and gamma-TiAl particles and grain boundary precipitates such as sigma. With such a unique microstructure, the samples show remarkably enhanced 0.2% yield strength and significantly improved ultimate tensile strength and strain hardening rates. Precipitates such as Al2O3, Heusler and sigma were found to have acted as effective dislocation motion obstacles. Dislocations tended to cut through the LRO L1(2) domains by forming stacking faults with a number of them intersecting to form immobile Lomer-Cottrell locks which are beneficial for strain hardening.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据