4.7 Article

Spark plasma sintering and mechanical properties of tungsten carbide in presence of Ni and Al2O3 binders

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.141968

关键词

Cemented carbide; Tungsten carbide; Nickel; Alumina; Sintering; SPS

资金

  1. Materials and Energy Research Center (MERC) [99391001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the impact of nickel and alumina binders on the sintering behavior, microstructure, and mechanical properties of WC-based cermets consolidated using the spark plasma sintering method. The results showed that with nickel addition and partial microstructure replacement, sintering temperature decreased, relative density increased, and improved mechanical properties were achieved, with WC-3wt%Ni-3wt% Al2O3 cermet exhibiting the best performance.
The current study was conducted to investigate the effect of nickel (Ni) and alumina (Al2O3) binders on the sintering behavior, microstructure, and final mechanical properties of WC-based cermets consolidated by the spark plasma sintering (SPS) method. To examine this, batches were mixed according to WC86-(Al2O3)14-x Nix where X= 0, 3, 6 wt % and WC94-(Al2O3)6-x Nix with X= 0, 3; applying high-energy ball milling. Sintering was carried out at temperatures of 1350 degrees C and 1500 degrees C. The results revealed that without Ni, in WC-6wt% Al2O3 and WC-14 wt% Al2O3 samples, the relative density and the fracture toughness were less than 94% and 7 MPa m(-1/2), respectively. However, with Ni addition and its partial replacement in the microstructure, not only sintering temperature decreased to 1350 degrees C, but also the obtained relative density was increased to higher than 98% and in the case of WC-3wt%Ni-3wt% Al2O3 cermet, almost full density samples have been achieved. Accordingly, due to better consolidation, this sample exhibited the combination of high strength (1127 +/- 53 MPa), high hardness (16.5 +/- 0.5 GPa), and proper fracture toughness (15.33 MPa m 1/2).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据