4.7 Article

Mechanical behavior at elevated temperatures of an Al-Mn-Mg-Sc-Zr alloy manufactured by selective laser melting

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.142032

关键词

Aluminum alloy; Selective laser melting; Precipitation hardening; Mechanical properties; Elevated temperatures

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [IH130100008]
  2. Australian Research Council [IH130100008] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High temperature compression and compression creep tests were conducted on Al-Mn-Mg-Sc-Zr alloy produced by selective laser melting, showing that solid solution strengthening in conjunction with LI2 Al3Sc precipitates improved creep resistance compared to conventionally cast alloys.
A high temperature compression and compression creep study was undertaken performed on Al-Mn-Mg-Sc-Zr alloy produced by selective laser melting (SLM). High temperature compression tests in the temperature range from 150 to 300 degrees C were conducted for the as-fabricated (AF) and aged (HT) SLM specimens. The 0.2% proof stress (sigma(0.2)) showed comparable values at different loading directions, which reveal an isotropic mechanical behavior. sigma(0.2) of the HT samples exceeded that of the AF at temperatures up to 200.C. At 250. C, sigma(0.2) of AF surpasses that of HT, due to the interaction of solid solution strengthening above 0.5 of the homologous temperature and the formation of new precipitates in this temperature range. For AF and HT sigma(0.2) becomes similar again at 300 degrees C. Creep tests were conducted at 250 degrees C in a stress range of 100-150 MPa. The Norton stress exponent was determined to (5.1 +/- 0.2) indicating that creep is dislocation climb controlled. An activation energy for creep of (198 +/- 11) kJ/mol was found. It is suggested that solid solution strengthening in conjunction with a dispersed LI2 Al3Sc precipitates improved the creep resistance compared to conventionally castmanufactured Al-Sc-Zr alloys.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据