4.7 Article

Elucidation of pore connection mechanism during ductile fracture of sintered pure iron by applying persistent homology to 4D images of pores: Role of open pore

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.142112

关键词

Ductile fracture; Sintered iron; Open pore; Closed pore; Persistent homology

资金

  1. I2CNER at Kyusyu University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilized synchrotron X-ray laminography and persistent homology to quantitatively analyze 4D pore configurations during ductile fracturing, revealing important information at the final stage before fracturing. The configurational changes in pores can predict the connection between the open pore and surrounding closed pores, which ultimately leads to the generation of a ductile crack.
4D pore configurations including an open pore were visualized by synchrotron X-ray laminography during the ductile fracturing process and then interpreted quantitatively using persistent homology (PH), a topological measure. In particular, this study used the zeroth PH, where the radius of an equivalent volume sphere for each pore and the distances to the other pores can be estimated for pairs of pores. The pore configurations were quantified as a set of birth and death values {(bi, di)} and changes due to increasing strain were tracked. As a result, the zeroth PH revealed the following information at the final stage before fracturing. First, the pair configurations between the open pore and closed pores decreased owing to the adsorption of closed pores by the open pore. Second, the configuration between the elongated closed pore and the open pore, where equivalent volume spheres are overwrapped, increased. These configurational changes in pores predict the pore connection between the open pore and surrounding closed pores that eventually generates a ductile crack perpendicular to the tensile stress. This study demonstrated the effective interpretation of the pore connection process that is essential to ductile crack generation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据