4.6 Article

Effect of Li and Li-RE co-doping on structure, stability, optical and electrical properties of bismuth magnesium niobate pyrochlore

期刊

MATERIALS RESEARCH BULLETIN
卷 145, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2021.111520

关键词

Complex bismuth niobates; Atoms distribution; Ab initio calculation; Thermal stability; Electrical properties

资金

  1. German-Russian Interdisciplinary Science Center (G-RISC) - German Federal Foreign Office via the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) [M-2020a-4_d]
  2. RFBR [19-03-00642 A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New pyrochlore-structured compounds Bi1.5Mg0.9-xLixNb1.5O7-delta (x = 0.25; 0.40) and Bi1.4RE0.1Mg0.5Li0.4Nb1.5O7-delta (RE - Eu, Ho, Yb) were synthesized and their atomic displacements and dopant distribution were studied. The preferred model with a direct band gap of 3.18 eV was predicted, and the thermal stability of the compounds was determined. Charge disbalance and oxygen vacancies were found to affect the dielectric behavior and conductivity of the ceramics.
New Bi1.5Mg0.9-xLixNb1.5O7-delta (x = 0.25; 0.40) and Bi1.4RE0.1Mg0.5Li0.4Nb1.5O7-delta (RE - Eu, Ho, Yb) compounds with the pyrochlore structure were synthesized. The displacements of the A-site atoms (96g) and O' ones (32e) as well as the Li and RE atoms distribution in the A-sites were determined. The dopant distribution was proven by ab initio calculations. The most preferable (Bi1.5Li0.5)(Nb1.5Mg0.5)O-7 model was predicted with a direct band gap of 3.18 eV corresponding to the experimental E-g for Bi1.5Mg0.5Li0.4Nb1.5O7-delta. The thermal stability of the compounds in air up to 1100-1220 degrees C and the reducing atmosphere up to 400 degrees C was determined. The charge disbalance in the A(2)O' sublattice and the oxygen vacancies predetermine the dielectric behavior of the ceramics up to 200 degrees C, the mixed conductivity at high temperatures (T > 200 degrees C), and the proton transport up to 400 degrees C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据