4.6 Article

Facile synthesis of novel round-cake-like α-Bi2O3 hierarchical architectures for extended visible-light photocatalytic performance

期刊

MATERIALS RESEARCH BULLETIN
卷 146, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2021.111594

关键词

Round-cake-like alpha-Bi2O3; Hierarchical architectures; Nanorod unit; Visible-light photoactivity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21571057, 21701042]
  2. Hunan Key Laboratory of Two-Dimensional Materials [2018TP1010]
  3. Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation for Postgraduate [CX20190271]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Round-cake-like alpha-Bi2O3 hierarchical architectures with nanorod units were successfully prepared through a sodium tartrate-induced aqueous method, showing superior photocatalytic activity in degrading pollutants under visible-light irradiation. The manipulation of final morphologies and good light-harvesting ability contribute to the enhanced photocatalytic performance of the assembled structures. EPR analysis revealed valid active species for the degradation system under neutral circumstances.
Round-cake-like alpha-Bi2O3 hierarchical architectures with nanorod units were successfully prepared through a sodium tartrate-induced aqueous method. The introduction of sodium tartrate to the reaction system was indispensable for the formation of the round-cake-like architectures, and NaOH amount played vital roles to manipulate the final morphologies of the samples. The alpha-Bi2O3 hierarchical architectures showed better photocatalytic performance than their rod-like counterparts on degrading bisphenol A (BPA) or ciprofloxacin (CIP) pollutants under visible-light irradiation. The superior photocatalytic activity was ascribed to the good light-harvesting ability of the nanomd assembled architectures. Trapping experiment results and EPR analysis revealed valid active species of h(+) and center dot O-2(-) radicals for the degradation system at neutral circumstance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据