4.6 Article

Indentation behavior of creep-feed grinding induced gradient microstructures in single crystal nickel-based superalloy

期刊

MATERIALS LETTERS
卷 306, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2021.130956

关键词

Indentation; Microstructure; Grinding; Creep; Single crystal nickel-based superalloy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51921003, 51775275, 51905363]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20190940, BK20210866]
  3. National Major Science and Technology Projects of China [2017-VII-0002-0095]
  4. Six Talents Summit Project in Jiangsu Province [JXQC-002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The gradient microstructures of surface layer in single crystal nickel-based superalloy were produced by creep-feed grinding. The mechanical properties and room-temperature creep behavior were evaluated using nano-indentation technique. Results show higher hardness and elastic modulus in gradient structures, but regions with nanograins exhibited increased creep depth, indicating unfavorable creep behavior changes.
The gradient microstructures of surface layer in single crystal nickel-based superalloy were produced by creep-feed grinding. The mechanical properties (i.e., hardness, elastic modulus) and room-temperature (RT) creep behavior of such structures were evaluated using a nano-indentation technique. Results show that the gradient structures along depth from ground surface consisted of nanograins, submicron grains and lamellar-shape structures, and dislocation structures. Furthermore, it was found that the hardness and elastic modulus of gradient structures were higher by 8-10% than that of bulk material on average. However, the regions con-taining nanograins showed a remarkable increase in creep depth compared to bulk material, implying that the creep behavior of ground layer was changed unfavorably. The obtained stress exponents of gradient structures suggested that dislocation activities were the main mechanism for indentation creep deformation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据