4.6 Article

Intelligent recognition of erosion damage to concrete based on improved YOLO-v3

期刊

MATERIALS LETTERS
卷 302, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2021.130363

关键词

Erosion damage to concrete; Artificial intelligence; Object detection; Surfaces; Improved YOLO-V3; Deep learning

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foun-dation of China [51768033]
  2. Gansu Province guide science and technology innovation and development special project - key research and development ability improvement project [2019ZX09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focused on intelligent identification of erosion damage to concrete using deep learning, establishing a dataset and proposing an improved YOLO-v3 algorithm model. The improved YOLO-v3 algorithm shows more accurate recognition of concrete erosion damage compared to other mainstream target detection algorithms, with an accuracy, precision, and MAP of 96.32%, 95.68%, and 75.68% respectively, validating the applicability of deep learning in the research of concrete erosion damage.
Concrete is one of the most common building materials in civil engineering. Buildings in Northwest China are facing strong wind erosion. Due to wind erosion, the surface of concrete peels off and erosion damage occurs, which has a very adverse impact on both the appearance of buildings and their safe use. Therefore, it is of great significance to carry out an intelligent identification of the erosion area of concrete. A deep learning dataset was established through a concrete erosion test to realize accurate recognition of erosion damage to concrete, and an improved YOLO-v3 algorithm model was proposed. Compared with other mainstream target detection algorithms, the improved version of YOLO-v3 is found to be able to achieve more accurate concrete erosion damage recognition, and the accuracy, precision, and map of the algorithm are 96.32%, 95.68%, and 75.68%, respectively, which verifies the applicability of deep learning to the research of concrete erosion damage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据