4.6 Article

Local elongation of a high Fe-containing Al-Si-Cu-Mg alloy by a deformation-semisolid extrusion process

期刊

MATERIALS LETTERS
卷 309, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2021.131337

关键词

Local elongation; Fragmented Fe-intermetallic compounds; Dislocation density; Deformation-semisolid extrusion process; Al-Si-Cu-Mg(-Fe) alloys

资金

  1. Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Korea [1525010989]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The local elongation behavior of Al-4.5Si-1.0Cu-0.3Mg(-1.0Fe) alloys produced by a deformation-semisolid extrusion process was investigated, with uniform and large local elongation confirmed in the 1 Fe alloy. The correlation between fragmented Fe-IMCs and local elongation was discussed, with high densities of fragmented Fe-IMCs and grain boundaries providing numerous locations for dislocation accumulation. The dislocation density of the as-extruded 1 Fe alloy was estimated with different strain levels, with more locations of dislocation multiplication extending the local elongation behavior of the alloy.
Local elongation of Al-4.5Si-1.0Cu-0.3 Mg(-1.0Fe) alloys (wt.%) produced by a deformation-semisolid extrusion process is investigated using an optical microscope, tensile tests, a transmission electron microscope, electron backscattered diffraction and X-ray diffraction. Not only uniform and but also large local elongation were confirmed in the as-extruded 1 Fe alloy. Tensile specimens survived even after showing necking and the maximum load gradually decreased from 16.7% to 28% of elongation. The correlation between fragmented Fe-IMCs and local elongation is discussed in terms of the strain distribution and dislocation density. High densities of fragmented Fe-IMCs and grain boundaries provide numerous locations for dislocation accumulation. The dislocation density rho of the as-extruded 1 Fe alloy was estimated with different strain levels. More locations of dislocation multiplication extend the local elongation behavior of the as-extruded 1 Fe alloy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据