4.6 Article

Coating of aluminum substrates with nanostructured Pd-Ni alloys by electrodeposition

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 277, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.125524

关键词

Pd-Ni alloys; Electrodeposition; Aluminum substrate; Nucleation and growth mechanisms; Pd-Ni coating

资金

  1. Universidad Nacional de Cordoba (SeCyT)
  2. ANPCyT-Foncyt (Argentina)
  3. CONICET

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By adjusting the electrodeposition parameters, the morphology and composition of Pd-Ni alloy deposits can be controlled. Deposits with higher electrodeposition potential and lower Pd content exhibit more efficiency and refinement. The alloy shows soft ferromagnetic properties at room temperature with significant remanence and coercivity, affected by the alloy composition.
Pd-Ni alloys are electrodeposited onto low-purity aluminum substrates varying both the composition of the feeding solution and the applied electrodeposition potential. It is found that the initial nucleation-and-growth mechanism in every case is well described by a 3D-type nucleation process. The resulting deposits consist of Pd-Ni alloys of different compositions, all electrocrystallized in a disordered fcc phase; depending on the electrodeposition parameters, different morphologies and compositions are obtained. It is found that when the electrodeposition potential is high and the Pd content in the feeding solution is low, the substrate coating is more efficient and the deposit morphology tends to refine into dendritic-like structures, making this kind of deposit quite interesting for using as electrodes in electrochemical devices. Room temperature magnetic measurements indicate that the samples are soft ferromagnetic with negligible demagnetizing effects. Dendritic and spheroidallike Pd-rich deposits exhibit larger remanence values and are more coercive than those with higher Ni content due to the dependence of the anisotropy constant on the alloy composition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据