4.7 Article

Direct observation of the grain boundaries acting as dislocation sources in nanocrystalline platinum

期刊

MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION
卷 181, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2021.111493

关键词

Nanocrystalline metal; Grain boundary-mediated plasticity; Dislocations; Transmission electron microscopy

资金

  1. Basic Science Center Program for Multiphase Evolution in Hyper-gravity of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51988101]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [Z180014]
  3. Beijing Outstanding Young Scien-tists Projects [BJJWZYJH01201910005018]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52071003, 91860202, 11604006]
  5. Beijing Municipal Education Commission Project [PXM2020-014204-000021, PXM2019-014204-500032]
  6. 111 Project [DB18015]
  7. Doctoral Research and Innovation Program of China People's Police University [BSKY2019001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used in situ TEM observations to directly reveal dislocation nucleation at grain boundaries in nanocrystalline metals. The findings contradict the common hypothesis predicted by molecular dynamic simulations, showing that complete dislocations can be emitted from grain boundaries in small-grained structures.
Previous molecular simulations and experiments suggest that grain boundaries (GBs) serve as dislocation sources in nanocrystalline metals. Although a large number of studies have been carried out, direct experimental evidence of dislocation nucleation from GBs has rarely been achieved. In this work, we performed in situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observations for a Pt nanocrystalline film with an average grain size of -10 nm during tensile deformation. This study revealed direct evidence of dislocation nucleation at the GBs at the atomic scale. This is different from the common hypothesis predicted by molecular dynamic simulations that only partial dislocations are emitted from GBs in small-grained structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据