4.7 Article

Bad neighbors? Niche overlap and asymmetric competition between native and Lessepsian limpets in the Eastern Mediterranean rocky intertidal

期刊

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
卷 171, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112703

关键词

Asymmetric competition; Lessepsian invasion; Intertidal hard substrates; Patella caerulea; Cellana rota; Eastern Mediterranean Sea

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P28983-B29]
  2. ERASMUS+ Traineeship
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P28983] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research in the Israeli rocky intertidal area found that competition between non-indigenous and native species led to a decline in the native species, with potential asymmetric competition. The non-indigenous and native assemblages had highly similar trait compositions, possibly leading to niche overlap.
The Eastern Mediterranean Sea hosts more non-indigenous species than any other marine region, yet their impacts on the native biota remain poorly understood. Focusing on mollusks from the Israeli rocky intertidal, we explored the hypothesis that this abiotically harsh habitat supports a limited trait diversity, and thus may promote niche overlap and competition between native and non-indigenous species. Indeed, native and non indigenous assemblage components often had a highly similar trait composition, caused by functionally similar native (Patella caerulea) and non-indigenous (Cellana rota) limpets. Body size of P. caerulea decreased with increasing C. rota prevalence, but not vice versa, indicating potential asymmetric competition. Although both species have coexisted in Israel for >15 years, a rapid 'replacement' of native limpets by C. rota has been reported for a thermally polluted site, suggesting that competition and regionally rapid climate-related seawater warming might interact to progressively erode native limpet performance along the Israeli coast.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据