4.7 Article

Novel Antioxidant Peptides from Crassostrea Hongkongensis Improve Photo-Oxidation in UV-Induced HaCaT Cells

期刊

MARINE DRUGS
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/md20020100

关键词

oyster; peptides; photo-oxidation; HaCaT cells

资金

  1. China Agricultural Research System of MOF and MARA
  2. High-Value Aquatic Products Processing and Utilization Innovation Team of Higher Education Institutions of Guangdong Province [GDOU2016030503]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enzymatic hydrolysates from oysters contain specific peptides that exhibit skin oxidation resistance. Through fractionation and mass spectrometry analysis, 17 peptides with high activity levels were identified, and AIVAEVNEAAK showed the strongest anti-UV-induced skin photo-oxidation activity among them.
Enzymatic hydrolysates from Oysters (OAH) display multiple biological activities. Previously, a 3~5 KDa oyster ultrafiltration component (OUP) showed a high property of preventing skin oxidation. Subsequently, we identified specific peptides with such activity. OUP was fractionated stepwise by Sephadex-G25 and RP-HPLC, and active fractions were screened using UV-irradiated HaCaT cells. The most active fractions (OP5-3) were analyzed by LC-MS/MS and a total of 17 peptides were identified. Results from mass spectrometry showed that OP5-3 consisted of peptides with a molecular weight range of 841.51-1786.92 Da. Six of these peptides were synthesized for validating the activity of resisting skin oxidation in the same cell model. All six peptides showed varying degrees of antioxidant activity, while pretreatment of HaCaT cells with AIVAEVNEAAK alleviated UV cytotoxicity, inhibited metalloproteinase 1 (MMP-1) expression, and showed the highest activity to resist UV-induced skin photo-oxidation among these peptides. In addition, results from molecular docking analysis of MMP-1 with AIVAEVNEAAK showed that AIVAEVNEAAK suppresses its enzymatic activity by directly interacting with MMP-1 and thus exhibit anti-photoaging activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据