4.6 Article

Effects of rrm1 on NNV Resistance Revealed by RNA-seq and Gene Editing

期刊

MARINE BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 23, 期 6, 页码 854-869

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10126-021-10068-x

关键词

Fish; Disease; RNA; Gene; Breeding

资金

  1. Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory, Singapore

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By using RNA-seq and association studies, researchers identified rrm1 as a causative gene for NNV resistance, and SNPs in the rrm1 gene can be utilized to accelerate genetic improvement for NNV resistance.
Viral nervous necrosis (VNN) disease caused by the nervous necrosis virus (NNV) is a major disease, leading to a huge economic loss in aquaculture. Previous GWAS and QTL mapping have identified a major QTL for NNV resistance in linkage group 20 in Asian seabass. However, no causative gene for NNV resistance has been identified. In this study, RNA-seq from brains of Asian seabass fingerlings challenged with NNV at four time points (5, 10, 15 and 20 days post-challenge) identified 1228, 245, 189 and 134 DEGs, respectively. Eight DEGs, including rrm1, were located in the major QTL for NNV resistance. An association study in 445 survived and 608 dead fingerlings after NNV challenge revealed that the SNP in rrm1 were significantly associated with NNV resistance. Therefore, rrm1 was selected for functional analysis, as a candidate gene for NNV resistance. The expression of rrm1 was significantly increased in the gill, liver, spleen and muscle, and was suppressed in the brain, gut and skin after NNV challenge. The rrm1 protein was localized in the nuclear membrane. Over-expression of rrm1 significantly decreased viral RNA and titer in NNV-infected Asian seabass cells, whereas knock-down of rrm1 significantly increased viral RNA and titer in NNV-infected Asian seabass cells. The rrm1 knockout heterozygous zebrafish was more susceptible to NNV infection. Our study suggests that rrm1 is one of the causative genes for NNV resistance and the SNP in the gene may be applied for accelerating genetic improvement for NNV resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据