4.2 Article

LncRNAs in domesticated animals: from dog to livestock species

期刊

MAMMALIAN GENOME
卷 33, 期 2, 页码 248-270

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00335-021-09928-7

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Animal genomes produce a large number of lncRNAs, which are transcripts longer than 200 nucleotides with low coding-potential capabilities. Studying lncRNAs in domestic animals can help understand the roles of protein-coding and non-coding RNAs in phenotypic variations. This review covers the current knowledge on transcriptome-based catalogues of lncRNAs in major domesticated animals, comparing them to human and mouse lncRNA catalogues across a wide phylogenetic scale.
Animal genomes are pervasively transcribed into multiple RNA molecules, of which many will not be translated into proteins. One major component of this transcribed non-coding genome is the long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), which are defined as transcripts longer than 200 nucleotides with low coding-potential capabilities. Domestic animals constitute a unique resource for studying the genetic and epigenetic basis of phenotypic variations involving protein-coding and non-coding RNAs, such as lncRNAs. This review presents the current knowledge regarding transcriptome-based catalogues of lncRNAs in major domesticated animals (pets and livestock species), covering a broad phylogenetic scale (from dogs to chicken), and in comparison with human and mouse lncRNA catalogues. Furthermore, we describe different methods to extract known or discover novel lncRNAs and explore comparative genomics approaches to strengthen the annotation of lncRNAs. We then detail different strategies contributing to a better understanding of lncRNA functions, from genetic studies such as GWAS to molecular biology experiments and give some case examples in domestic animals. Finally, we discuss the limitations of current lncRNA annotations and suggest research directions to improve them and their functional characterisation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据